Posts

Showing posts with the label Want vs. Warrant

Ricky Munday: Federal Rules of Evidence: Presumption vs. Proof

Image
Ricky Munday: Federal Rules of Evidence — Presumption vs. Proof Official Channel of Ricky L. Pinzon — featuring the investigative persona Ricky Munday ( @RickyMunday ) FRE 301, Rebuttable Presumptions, and Institutional Regularity “So I discovered in civil litigation related to the Federal Rules of Evidence, particularly 301 and 302, they have something called this presumption of correctness, right? But the reality of that regularity that becomes self-validation in the process... establishes a simple but important principle: Presumption is not proof. Presumption merely requires the opposing party to produce evidence that rebuts it. And once contrary evidence is presented, the burden of persuasion remains where it originally belongs... and the institution invoking the presumption does not automatically prevail and enjoy qualified immunity simply because it began from a...

Ricky Munday: Want vs. Warrant #rickymunday

Image
Ricky Munday: Want vs. Warrant & Jurisdictional Overreach Official Channel of Ricky L. Pinzon — featuring the investigative persona Ricky Munday Surveillance Hits, Roadside Entrapment, and Territorial Limits “Their ALPR will pick up all the license plates... and if there’s a warrant or a ‘want’ on one of those vehicle drivers, it flags... So when they stop you, the first thing they’re going to do is ask you: ‘Do you know why I stopped you?’ And the average person will incriminate themselves by guessing... Sometimes law enforcement will follow you outside of their jurisdiction—meaning if you’re in West Covina and you’re coming into La Puente... they have no business following you into La Puente because La Puente is Sheriff’s territory.” In this segment, Ricky Munday examines two critical dimens...